Metaview is an AI-powered recruiting platform for hiring teams. It's designed to automate various recruitment tasks, including candidate sourcing, note-taking during interviews, and creating job postings.
So, how good is Metaview at these tasks in practice, and is it worth its price?
To find out, we've tested the platform ourselves and analyzed real Metaview reviews from actual recruiters.
Key Metaview Features — A Brief Overview
Metaview has 4 essential features for recruiters:
- AI sourcing
- AI note-taking
- AI reports
- AI job posts
Together, these features cover the entire candidate pipeline — and they're designed to automate most of it.
AI Sourcing
Metaview's AI sourcing feature proactively finds candidate profiles online, based on your initial prompt.
As you can see, the AI sourcing menu is nearly identical to that of the most popular LLMs (Large Language Models), such as ChatGPT and Perplexity.
After you describe your ideal candidate, Metaview's AI will search for them online and generate candidate cards — summaries of candidates' education and recent experience. You can quickly categorize these candidate cards into "Yes," "No," and "Maybe."
While this is useful, it's hard to shake the feeling that Metaview is just a polished interface built on top of OpenAI's ChatGPT — but at a much higher price.
That makes sense, since the company says its AI runs on “GPT-5-level intelligence.”
Most of the candidate search results are just links to LinkedIn profiles, which you could easily find on LinkedIn or by asking ChatGPT to do it.
AI Interview Notes
Once you connect your calendar to Metaview, the platform's bot automatically joins your calls and records interviews.
After conducting each interview, you can see the full transcript in Metaview — along with AI-generated summaries, one-paragraph TL;DRs, and video snippets of key moments.
The AI transcriptions and meeting summaries are Metaview's most widely used features. Most users who have shared their experience with Metaview only mention using the platform's note-taking functions.
AI Reports
Metaview can also generate visual reports based on your recordings. These reports highlight various useful metrics, including:
- Interviewer punctuality
- Candidate talk times
- Interviewer question count
In a large team of recruiters, these reports make evaluation easier and help you spot trends in your recruitment pipeline.
AI Job Descriptions
Metaview's AI model can also create a job post for you, based on information you provide after a series of questions about the open role.
Also, it can improve an existing job posting with a series of grammar, syntax, and quality checks.
While the job postings Metaview generates are decent, it's much better at improving existing job ads — that's where its AI's pre-training on job postings really shines.
In both cases, however, you don't really get anything you wouldn't have with a simple ChatGPT subscription, which costs $40 less per user.
If you ask ChatGPT to generate a job ad and provide it with the same information you give Metaview, OpenAI's chatbot gives you a similar job posting — certainly no less detailed than Metaview's.
The difference is mostly in formatting, which you can easily tweak yourself or within ChatGPT. With that in mind, Metaview isn't cost-effective for this aspect of recruitment.
What Do Hiring Managers & Recruiters Say About Metaview?
In general, users appear to be satisfied with Metaview.
The AI tool has a decent score on G2, though practically all verified reviewers only mention using the platform for AI-powered structured notes.
On the other hand, Metaview's bias-free sourcing module for the rest of the hiring process seems less popular — probably because it's too expensive for solo recruiters and small teams.
Also, users consistently mention a few issues with Metaview, including:
- Transcription errors in various languages
- Inaccurate summaries with overlooked context
- Problems with the meeting bot
Non-English Language Issues
Nominally, Metaview supports AI transcriptions and summaries in 50+ languages.
However, even satisfied Metaview users point out that the platform often makes mistakes while transcribing non-English languages.
Metaview seems to struggle with heavy accents and regional dialects. In non-English meetings, it can even confuse who's talking and mislabel discussions.
Also, note that Metaview only supports one language at a time. According to the platform's support page, other languages spoken during a call will be automatically translated to your chosen language.
This isn't ideal for recruiting pipelines in global teams, where the organization often tests a candidate's English skills while conducting the rest of the interview in another language.
Inaccurate Notes For Technical Interviews
In general conversation, Metaview usually creates great notes that accurately depict the flow of the conversation.
However, multiple users have noticed that it struggles with nuance, context, and important details in technical conversations.
If you need to extensively edit notes to accurately reflect the candidate experience, that defeats the purpose of a tool for automating manual data entry.
In longer interviews that last for a few hours, some users report that Metaview stops taking notes altogether. If you need an AI tool with unlimited conversations, Metaview may not be the right fit.
Meeting Bot Issues
Metaview pulls information about your meetings from calendars and scheduling tools, so its bot knows which calls to record.
Unfortunately, you may encounter a bug with Metaview's meeting bot if you reschedule a call. In that case, Metaview might fail to join and record your interview.
Also, the lack of a bot-free way to record calls is problematic. Some candidates feel uneasy about the presence of an AI bot. If they underperform or decide to drop out of the process, you may lose great leads for the position.
How Much Does Metaview Cost?
Here's a breakdown of Metaview's different pricing tiers:
Basically, the AI Recruiting Platform tier is the only one that includes all Metaview features — and the price of that subscription isn't publicly available.
Otherwise, you can get the sourcing features for a whopping $100 per user per month, or unlimited use of the note-taking features for $60 per month.
Should You Use Metaview for Recruitment?
Metaview is a decent AI assistant for recruiters, but it's far from cost-efficient — regardless of your business size.
The technology behind its automated job postings and reports is available with a $20 ChatGPT subscription — and you can find more accurate AI note takers for a far lower price.
Try Bluedot Instead
Bluedot is an accurate AI notetaker for recruiters that provides transcripts and meeting notes in 100+ languages, from interviews and other calls on popular videoconferencing platforms — including Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams.
Via its Chrome extension, Bluedot supports bot-free recording — letting your candidates feel at ease and perform to the best of their abilities.
It also gives you useful insights for each conversation, making it perfect for evaluating recruiters and candidates.
Bluedot assists you with reports that show how engaged each interviewee is, helping you decide if they're a good fit for the position.
After each call, you get access to talk ratios and interaction stats — including longest monologues, talking speed, and the number of questions each person asked.
Also, Bluedot has a useful interview template for its AI-generated meeting notes. With it, you can instantly get feedback on key data about each candidate, including:
- Relevant experience
- Level of motivation
- Desired compensation
- Availability per hour, week, or month
- Candidate questions and answers
You don't have to spend time correcting notes either, since Bluedot supports accurate transcriptions and notes in 100+ languages.
Bluedot has all the features you'd actually use in Metaview — but at a far lower price.
Even with monthly billing, Bluedot's most expensive subscription costs $20 less than Metaview's cheapest tier. And Metaview only gives you the same AI note-taking features for that price. If you want candidate sourcing options, you have to pay $60 more.
Don't overpay, and get a better AI interview assistant instead.
